Every law firm has a moment when the “numbers” stop matching the reality of daily work.
A partner reviews an associate’s year and sees steady billable hours, prompt emails, and no serious client complaints. Meanwhile, the PD team sees something different: uneven delegation, communications that only happen under pressure, and last-minute fire drills after partners have moved on. The associate? They’re left wondering why the feedback feels disconnected from what they thought was solid work.
Three perspectives. Three different stories.
All built on the same, familiar metrics and yet, all missing what actually matters.
That disconnect isn’t random.
It’s a structural flaw in how law firms measure performance.
According to the 2024 Report on the State of the U.S. Legal Market by Thomson Reuters Institute, demand shifts, staffing pressures, and changing client expectations have exposed long-standing flaws in traditional evaluation systems.
Meanwhile, the NALP Foundation’s 2024 attrition data shows rising associate turnover with unclear expectations and inconsistent evaluation criteria often cited among the top causes.
At SRA, working with U.S. firms for over 30 years, we’ve seen that the metrics many firms rely on billable hours, responsiveness, writing quality, only explain a fraction of what predicts long-term success, growth, trust, and retention.
Because of that, most law firms don’t have a “performance problem.”
They have a measurement problem.
And the good news is, it’s fixable.
Why Law Firms Default to the Wrong Metrics
Firms don’t intend to measure wrongly. They default to what’s visible, easy, familiar.
- Billable hours: universal, trackable, simple.
- Responsiveness and timely emails: easy to see and comment on.
- Writing quality: intuitive gauge of legal skill.
These made sense when work was simpler, teams were smaller, and oversight was direct.
But legal work has changed: hybrid staffing, rotating associates, faster timelines, cross-practice collaboration, virtual teams.
What used to be visible is now hidden and what used to count no longer captures what matters.
As a result:
- Hours tell you someone worked, not how they worked.
- Responsiveness masks last-minute scrambles.
- Writing quality doesn’t show delegation, teamwork, reliability.
The gap between “effort” and “impact” widens. Traditional metrics can’t bridge it.
Why Hours and Intuition Don’t Work Anymore
Lawyers have long relied on instinct. Judgment, gut feel, patterns. It used to work.
But now:
- Associates shift between partners and practice groups.
- Expectations vary wildly by team.
- Visibility into day-to-day work has dropped.
- Feedback depends on partner style, not shared standards.
That dominoes into confusion:
“I got great feedback from Partner A, but Partner B says I need to improve.”
“I don’t know what I’m being measured against.”
Partners sense it too:
“I expect something different than my colleague across the hall.”
When every review becomes personal, fairness disappears. And turnover doesn’t wait.
What Firms Should Measure Instead: The Real Drivers of Success
Firms don’t need more numbers, they need better design.
Drawing on decades of SRA advisory work, review cycles, feedback sessions, and performance data, five dimensions consistently predict true success:
- Managing the Work: How well an associate drives matters forward: planning, transparency, independence, reliability.
- Quality of Legal Work: Not just “good writing,” but clarity, structure, accurate reasoning, thoroughness, responsiveness to feedback.
- Communication & Collaboration: How associates interact with partners, peers, support staff, and clients; especially under pressure or on complex matters.
- Client Service Behaviors: Professionalism, judgment, responsiveness, trust, the quiet but essential elements clients sense, even if not on paper.
- Growth & Learning Agility: How well an associate adapts, learns, seeks feedback, improves, and handles changing workloads.
These aren’t vague labels. They’re real behaviors. Consistent behaviors. The kind that show up matter after matter, the kind that lead to trust, promotion-readiness, and client confidence.
Firms that track these see more stable teams, clearer promotions, fewer surprises, and stronger retention.
That’s not theory. It’s what works.
How Firms Can Fix Their Metrics
You don’t need a huge overhaul. You need structure.
- Build a shared rubric
- Create behavior-based evaluation criteria, not generic corporate HR competencies.
- Use the rubric to guide expectations (not replace judgment)
- Partners still use their experience, but within a shared frame of reference.
- Calibrate partners before reviews
- A 30–60 minute session prevents months of confusion, inconsistent standards, or unfair comparisons.
- Add confidential upward feedback
- Associates see what partners don’t. Their insights often highlight systemic issues before they become problems.
- Use short, predictable check-ins rather than only annual reviews
- Quarterly or matter-end reviews work better, more frequent feedback reduces surprises, improves clarity, and supports growth.
- Adopt a legal-specific performance solution if possible
- Generic HR tools rarely fit well in a law-firm context. For a breakdown of why legal-specific solutions matter, see “How to Lead a Winning Law Firm: 7 Metrics That Should Guide Every Review.” srahq.com+1
Applying these steps does more than improve numbers. It reshapes culture.
The Outcome of Better Metrics: What Changes When You Get This Right
When firms shift how they measure performance, this happens:
- Review conversations become clearer, shorter, more productive
- Associates understand what “good performance” means and how to grow
- Partners trust evaluations and each other more
- Feedback becomes less about hours, more about development
- Turnover drops, morale improves, long-term retention rises
- The firm moves from reactive firefighting to proactive growth
And maybe most importantly: associates finally understand how they’re being evaluated, not just that they worked a lot.
That clarity changes careers.
And it changes firm culture.
Relevant SRA Insights to Explore Next
- For a deeper dive on measuring the right things, see “What Really Predicts Associate Success? These 6 KPIs Do”. srahq.com
- For insight on how review systems can become fairer and more trusted at all levels, check out “Stop Grading Lawyers on Hours,Start Measuring Results That Clients Value”. srahq.com
- To understand how firms balance performance expectations with attorney wellbeing and avoid burnout read “How Successful Law Firms Balance Performance and People.” srahq.com
- For guidance on building a full review process from scratch especially for small and mid-sized firms see “How to Improve Performance Reviews in Law Firms.” srahq.com
.png){kind=small}