SRA

Most lawyers have heard these words in a performance review:

“You need to be more proactive.”

But few walk away knowing what that means.

At Survey Research Associates (SRA), we believe that vague feedback stalls growth. That’s why we help law firms replace subjective adjectives with clear, behavior-based review criteria so every lawyer knows exactly what “good” looks like.

The Problem with Vague Criteria

In many law firms, associates receive feedback filled with words like “leadership,” “ownership,” “initiative,” or “team player.” These sound professional but they’re not measurable.

When expectations aren’t clear, performance reviews turn into guesswork. Associates feel frustrated, and partners feel like the process isn’t producing real improvement.

As one managing partner shared on LinkedIn, “We tell associates to ‘take initiative,’ but we never tell them what that looks like in our context.”

This isn’t just a culture issue it’s a fairness issue. Research in the Harvard Business Review found that vague evaluation language increases bias and makes it harder for underrepresented groups to advance. When feedback is subjective, even good intentions can produce uneven results.

Why Behavior-Based Review Criteria Matter

1. They Make Expectations Measurable

A phrase like “shows leadership” could mean anything. But a behavioral criterion like:

“Leads at least one matter kickoff meeting per quarter and documents key takeaways,”

gives both the reviewer and the lawyer a shared understanding of what success looks like.

Behavior-based systems use observable actions rather than opinions. This approach often called a Behavioral Observation Scale (BOS) helps reduce bias and increase consistency. (AIHR: Behavioral Observation Scale Guide)

2. They Build Fairness and Trust

When feedback is specific, it’s easier for lawyers to see where they stand and what’s next. Partners aren’t “judging character,” they’re describing performance.

This clarity builds psychological safety, a term popularized by organizational researcher Amy Edmondson. When lawyers trust that feedback is fair, they’re more willing to share their challenges and ideas creating a culture of continuous learning.

3. They Improve the Review Conversation

Vague: “You need to improve your collaboration.”

Specific: “In three client meetings last quarter, team members noted you didn’t delegate follow-up tasks. Next quarter, we’d like to see you assign roles before leaving the room.”

The difference is transformative. Clear feedback gives lawyers something to do, not something to decode.

How SRA Builds Clear Review Rubrics for Small Firms

SRA has developed a proven process for small and midsize law firms to move from abstract criteria to action-driven review systems.

Step 1: Define Success by Role

We start by identifying what success means for each level junior associate, senior associate, counsel, and partner. This ensures expectations evolve with experience, not tenure alone.

Step 2: Translate Adjectives into Behaviors

We replace adjectives like “initiative” with real examples such as:

“Identifies client risks and proposes next steps within 24 hours.”
“Offers to lead one training session for junior team members per quarter.”

These statements are evidence-based and observable, which means reviewers can evaluate objectively.

Step 3: Create a Scalable Rating Rubric

Each behavior is rated on a 1–5 scale:

1 = rarely demonstrates the behavior

3 = consistently demonstrates without prompting

5 = models and teaches it to others

This structure helps reviewers stay consistent and helps associates measure progress over time. (AIHR Guide to BOS)

Step 4: Calibrate and Pilot

We test the rubric within one practice group to gather feedback and fine-tune the language. It’s a collaborative process that ensures the criteria fit the firm’s culture and client expectations.

Step 5: Train Partners and Associates

We host short workshops that teach reviewers how to apply the rubric consistently. Associates also learn how to self-assess using the same behaviors, so everyone is aligned on what performance looks like.

Step 6: Link Feedback to Development

Each behavior connects directly to the firm’s development framework. For example, the competency “mentorship” might tie to a firm goal like “build future leaders internally.”

This turns reviews from checklists into growth maps.

Case Example: Clarity in Action

A 40-lawyer firm in Boston worked with SRA in 2024 to overhaul its evaluation process. Previously, their review form included phrases like “delivers client service effectively” and “handles matters independently.”

After implementing SRA’s behavior-based rubric:

87% of associates said they understood exactly what was expected for their next promotion (up from 61%)
Retention rose by 22% over 12 months
Partners reported clearer, faster review meetings because feedback was anchored in observable evidence

The result? Less anxiety, more growth and a measurable impact on firm culture.

Why Clear Criteria Drive Growth

Behavior-based rubrics don’t just make reviews fairer; they make them actionable.

Associates can track their progress transparently.
Partners can deliver feedback without ambiguity.
Firms can link evaluation data to retention and development metrics.

As one SRA client put it, “We stopped talking about personality and started talking about progress.”

And that’s the difference between review systems that frustrate and systems that elevate.

Final Word

In today’s competitive legal landscape, small firms can’t afford vague feedback loops. The future of law firm performance management is transparent, behavior-driven, and fair.

At SRA, we help firms design review systems that define success clearly so lawyers grow with confidence, not confusion.

Because when everyone knows what “good” looks like, growth becomes inevitable.

References

‍

Why Clear Criteria Build Better Lawyers: Inside SRA’s Small Firm Review System