Mentoring is widely recognized as a vital ingredient for attorney development and long-term firm success. Yet, in many law firms, traditional mentoring models fall short—often because they lack honest, two-way feedback. Upward reviews, which allow junior attorneys to provide confidential feedback to their supervising partners and mentors, offer a transformative path forward.
Why Traditional Mentoring Needs a Rethink
Law firms often promote partners based on legal expertise and business results, not necessarily on their ability to mentor or manage people. This can leave a gap between how leaders think they’re supporting junior attorneys and how those attorneys actually experience mentorship. Associates may hesitate to voice concerns, fearing negative repercussions or simply believing their feedback won’t matter.
How Upward Reviews Make Mentoring Better:
1. Real-Time Insight for Mentors
Upward reviews provide mentors with direct, actionable feedback from those they are guiding. This helps mentors understand whether their advice, support, and approach are genuinely helping junior attorneys develop—or if there are blind spots that need attention. With this insight, mentors can adjust their style, communication, and involvement to better support mentees.
2. Fostering a Culture of Openness and Growth
Confidential upward reviews create a safe space for junior attorneys to express what’s working and what isn’t. This openness not only bridges communication gaps but also encourages mentors to take ownership of their development as leaders. When mentors know they will receive honest feedback, they are more likely to engage thoughtfully and proactively in the mentoring relationship.
3. Aligning Mentoring with Firm Values
Upward reviews can be structured to focus on key competencies such as inclusivity, workload management, and professional growth. This ensures that mentoring isn’t just about passing on legal knowledge, but also about fostering a supportive, equitable, and high-performing culture. When feedback highlights where mentors excel or fall short, firms can align mentoring practices with their broader goals and values.
4. Building Stronger Relationships and Retention
Regular upward feedback cycles—quarterly or annual—provide ongoing opportunities for mentors and mentees to connect and recalibrate their relationship. This continuous dialogue strengthens trust, increases engagement, and can significantly improve associate retention, as attorneys feel heard and supported.
5. Data-Driven Improvement and Accountability
Over time, upward review systems can generate data that tracks improvements or highlights persistent challenges. Firms can identify top mentors, address gaps with targeted coaching, and ensure that feedback leads to real change. This data-driven approach makes mentoring more effective and accountable at every level.
Practical Steps for Law Firms
- Implement Confidential, Behavior-Focused Reviews: Ensure anonymity and focus feedback on specific mentoring behaviors, not personalities.
- Educate and Support All Participants: Train both mentors and mentees on the purpose and process of upward reviews, emphasizing growth and development.
- Act on the Feedback: Use results to provide coaching, recognize outstanding mentors, and make firm-wide improvements.
- Repeat and Track Progress: Regularly repeat the review process and analyze trends to ensure continuous improvement.
By giving junior attorneys a voice and providing mentors with honest, actionable feedback, law firms can create a culture where mentoring thrives, attorneys grow, and the entire firm benefits from a more engaged, high-performing team.
.png){kind=small}
