Performance & feedback
Build useful feedback into how your firm evaluates and develops its people.
Partner reviews, upward reviews, downward reviews, 360° feedback, associate and counsel evaluation, self assessment and peer interviews. Instruments are drawn from a library refined across more than a million delivered reports and tailored to your competency framework.
Reports arrive at three levels: individual, practice group and firm, each with benchmark context so a score means something on the day it is read. Findings then feed a developmental plan for each reviewee, so the cycle ends in a commitment rather than a document.
Typical cycle
- W1–2Instrument design and firm approval
- W3Population load, magic-link distribution
- W3–5Fielding, automated reminders, participation reporting
- W6Data aggregation, threshold suppression
- W7–8Report delivery and findings readout
Example programs
- Attorney evaluations
- Partner upward reviews
- Leadership 360 feedback
- Self-assessment
- Business services evaluations
- Development plans
Examples of supported work. Firms name and organize their own programs.
What you can tailor
- Who is reviewed, and who reviews them
- Competencies and questions
- An annual cycle, or another cadence you agree
- Who sees which report
What the work produces
- Individual evaluation reports
- Group and firm summaries, to the access rules you set
- Development actions and the follow-up on them
How the feedback is handled
These are not one instrument. A downward evaluation is attributed to the partner who wrote it, because the associate needs to know whose judgment it is. An upward review is confidential and reported only above an agreed threshold, because an associate assessing the partner who staffs their matters answers honestly only when identification is impossible. Both are explained to participants before they answer.
How to run it
Run with your team
Use Artemis to configure and run the agreed program, with onboarding and standard support. Your team owns administration and follow-through.
Explore Artemis →Have SRA manage the program
Agree the design, administration, analysis and readouts you want SRA to provide. Your firm retains the decisions and actions that follow.
Discuss a managed program →Running one program in Artemis does not commit the rest of the firm to the same arrangement. You can choose differently for different work.
What an agreed scope covers
An engagement covers the review types, the populations and the cycle you agree. Adding a review type or a population is a change of scope rather than something a practice includes by default.
Service pages